Tools

※Japanese, English, Chinese version are available.

 

Interaction Rating Scale : IRS

 

Description of Measures

Purpose
To measure the child’s social skills and the caregiver’s child rearing skills through observations of caregiver-child interactions.

 

Objects
IRS is appropriate for the assessment of interactions between caregivers and children from birth to age eight years.

 

Conceptual Organization

     This rating scale includes 70 items for behavioral score and 11 items for impression score, grouped into 10 subscales. 5 subscales focus on children’s social skills: Autonomy, Responsiveness, Empathy, Motor regulation, and Emotional regulation. Another 5 items assess caregiver’s parenting skills: Respect for autonomy development, Respect for responsiveness development, Respect for empathy development, Respect for cognitive development, and Respect for social-emotional development. And one item assesses overall impression of synchronous relationships.

 

Item Origin/Selection Process
The items were selected utilizing the HOME (Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, Caldwell and Bradley, 1974), SSRS (Social Skills Rating Systems) , and NCAST (Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training) teaching scales (Sumner & Spietz, 1994).

 

Materials
Non-copyrighted JCCC (Japan Child Care Cohort) version of the form is included in this manual

 

Time Required
Less than five minutes

 

Administration Method
Naturalistic observation in various settings (home, laboratory, etc.)

 

Training
A training manual for the IRS has been developed for practitioners and researchers (Anme, 2009).

 

Scoring

 

Score Types
Two different sets of variable are scored: behavior items and impression items of the subscale. It specifies the features of interaction for both subscale and total scores. Each subscale assesses the presence of behavior (1=Yes, 0=No), and the sum of all items in the subscale provides the overall behavior score.

Scores on the impression items and the overall impression item are on a five-point scale, (where 1=not evident at all, 2=not evident, 3=neutral, 4=evident, 5=evident at high level) and measure assessment of caregiver-child interaction.

The observer completes the checklist composed of 25 items focusing on children’s behavior toward caregivers (e.g., Child looks at caregiver’s face as social referencing) and 45 items focusing on the caregiver behavior. The observer then provides an impression on a 5-point scale for each subscale and for an overall impression.

 

Score Interpretation
Higher scores reflect higher level of child’s social skills and caregiver’s rearing skills.

 

Psychometric Support

Reliability and Validity
The Interaction Rating Scale (IRS) was tested on 211 randomly selected normal children in Japan and it show highly significant correlations with NCAST teaching scales (Child items r=.70; Caregiver items r=.98, Total r=.89).

 

The IRS was tested on 38 Japanese childlen with debelopmental disorders (ADHG/PDD), mental retardation, abuse or maltreatment history. The IRS scores were significantly related to the children’s behavior and environmental problems, confirming the reliability and validity of the scalr (Anme, Yato, Shinohara & Sugisawa, 2007)

The Cronbach’s alpha of IRS subscales ranged from 0.62 to 0.80 (Anme, Yato, Shinohara & Sugisawa, 2007)

 

Norms and/or Comparative Data

JCCC/JST Use

Cohort research in the “Brain-Science & Society Program” in Japan, supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), used the IRS for “Exploring the effect factors on the child’s cognitive and behavior development in Japan”.

Data Points
Children ages 18-months-old, 30-months-old, 42-months-old and 7 years old: Mie and Osaka sites, which are two middle cities in Japan.

Respondent
Primary maternal caregivers and their children

Mnemonic and Version
IRS research version (81 items) and practice version (11 itesms)

 

Rationale

Previous research demonstrates that caregiver-child interactions are critical to positive social skill development and can predict future development as well.

Administration and Scoring Notes
Scale scores are generated by summing the scores of all items and range from 3 to 22. Mean scale scores can also be used.

 

Results

Descriptive Statistics and Reliability
Table 1 presents the mean scores and Cronbach’s Alpha for the IRS for 18 month old children and their caregivers by children’s gender.

Internal consistency in each categories, as measured by Cronbach’s alpha, ranged from 0.43 to 0.88, and the total Internal consistency was excellent (0.85 – 0.91).

The comparative data by different children’s ages will be added with new analyses in the near future.

 

Reference:

  1. Anme T. Manual of Interaction Rating Scale. Japan Pediatric Press. 2009.
  2. Anme T. Bridge between Mind and Education: Evidence from Longitudinal Research on Child Care Environment and Child. Asia Pacific Conference on Mind, Brain and Education. 1. 2008; 14-18.
  3. Anme T., Yato Y., Shinohara R., & Sugisawa Y. The reliability and validity of the assessment method for children’s social competence: Parent-child Interaction Rating Scale. Japanese Journal of Health Care and Welfare. 14. 2007; 23-31.
  4. Anme T, Gender differences of children’s social skills and parenting using Interaction Rating Scale (IRS), Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2, 260-268, 2010
  5. Anme T, Interaction Rating Scale (IRS) as an Evidence-Based Practical Index of Children’s Social Skills and Parenting, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 419-426, 2010
  6. Shinohara R, The Trajectories of children’s social competence and the caregiver’s attitude of “praise”:longitudinal perspective, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 143-149, 2010
  7. Sugisawa Y, Anme T. Validity and reliability of Interaction Rating Scale as an index of social competence, Journal of Japanese Human Sciences in Health and Social Services, 16(1), 43-55, 2010
  8. Sugisawa Y, Anme T, et al. The Trajectory Patterns of Parenting and the Social Competence of Toddlers: A Longitudinal Perspective, Journal of Epidemiorogy, 20, 459-465, 2010.
  9. Tong L, Anme T, et al. Relationship of working mother’s parenting style and consistency to early childhood development: a longitudinal investigation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(10), 2067-2076, 2009.

Index of Child Care Environment : ICCE

 

Description of Measures

Purpose
To measure the child rearing environment by questionnaire.

 

Objects
ICCE is appropriate for the assessment of raring environment from birth to age six years.

 

Conceptual Organization

     This scale includes 13 items, grouped into 4 subscales: Human stimulation, Social stimulation, Avoidance of restriction, and Social support.

 

Item Origin/Selection Process
The items were selected utilizing the HOME (Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, Caldwell and Bradley, 1974) and Japanese version of HOME (Anme, 1989).

 

Materials
Non-copyrighted JCCC (Japan Child Care Cohort) version of the form is included in this manual

 

Time Required
Less than five minutes

 

Administration Method
Questionnaire in various settings (home, child care center, laboratory, etc.)

 

Manual
A manual for the ICCE has been developed for practitioners and researchers (Anme, 2004).

 

Scoring

 

Score Types
Each item rated ranges from 1(“rarely”) to 5 (“almost everyday”) with a higher score reflecting a higher level of stimulation.

Score Interpretation
Higher scores reflect higher level of raring environment.

 

Psychometric Support

Reliability and Validity
The ICCE was tested on various longitudinal studies and verified predictive validity. The ICCE scores were significantly related to the children’s behavior and environmental problems later in their life (Anme, Shinohara & Sugisawa, 2012, 2003).
The ICCE was tested on 1,158 children and the Cronbach’s alpha is 0.63.

 

Norms and/or Comparative Data

[ Japan Child Care Cohort ]

Cohort research in the “Japan Child Care Research” in Japan, supported by Japanese Government, used the ICCE for “Exploring the effect factors on the child’s development in Japan”.

 

Data Points
Children ages from 0-months-old to 6 years old all over Japan.

Respondent
Primary caregivers and their children

[ JCCC/JST Use ]

Cohort research in the “Brain-Science & Society Program” in Japan, supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), used the IRS for “Exploring the effect factors on the child’s cognitive and behavior development in Japan”.

 

Data Points
Children ages 18-months-old, 30-months-old, 42-months-old and 7 years old: Mie and Osaka sites, which are two middle cities in Japan.

Respondent
Primary maternal caregivers and their children

 

Reference:

  1. Anme T, et al. Health of school-aged children in 11+ hours of center-based care, Creative Education, 3(2), 2012
  2. Anme T, et al. Does night care affect development? A five-year follow-up, Education, 2(5), 2012
  3. Anme T, et al. A pilot study of social competence assessment using Interaction Rating Scale Advanced, ISRN Pediatrics, 272913, 2011
  4. Anme T, et al. Child development and childcare in Japan, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 193-210, 2010
  5. Anme T, McCall M. Empowerment in health and community settings, In Muto T. Edited, Asian Perspectives and Evidence on Health Promotion and Education, 162-172, Springer, 2010
  6. Anme T, et al. Gender differences of children’s social skills and parenting using Interaction Rating Scale (IRS), Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2, 260-268, 2010
  7. Anme T, et al. Trajectories of social competence by using Interaction Rating Scale (IRS) as an evidence-based practical index of children’s social skills and parenting, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 419-426, 2010
  8. Anme T, et al. Effectiveness of Japan’s extended/night child care: A five-year follow up, Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2, 5573-5580, 2010
  9. Shinohara R, Anme T, et al. Factors related to social competence development of eighteen-month toddlers: longitudinal perspective focused on “praise” of parenting in four and nine-month infants Journal of Japanese Human Sciences in Health and Social Services, 16(1), 31-42, 2010
  10. Shinohara R, Anme T, et al. The Trajectories of children’s social competence and the caregiver’s attitude of “praise” : longitudinal perspective, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 143-149, 2010
  11. Sugisawa Y, Anme T, et al. Reliability and Validity of Interaction Rating Scale as an index of social competence, Journal of Japanese Human Sciences in Health and Social Services, 16(1), 43-55, 2010.
  12. Sugisawa Y, Anme T, et al. The Trajectory Patterns of Parenting and the Social Competence of Toddlers: A Longitudinal Perspective, Journal of Epidemiorogy, 20, 459-465, 2010.
  13. Tong L, Anme T, et al. Relationship of working mothers’ parenting style and consistency to early childhood development: a longitudinal investigation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(10), 2067-2076, 2009
  14. Tong L, Anme T, et al. Relationship between children’s intelligence and their emotional/behavioral problems and social competence: gender differences in first graders, Journal of Epidemiorogy, 20, 466-471, 2010.
  15. Tanaka E, Anme T, et al. Implication of social competence development among thirty-month toddlers: focused on theory of mind, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 447-451, 2010
  16. Tomisaki E, Anme T, et al. A Longitudinal Study on Social Competence Development and Sleeping Habits, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 472-475, 2010
  17. Yato Y, Infant Responses to Maternal Still Face at 9 Months predict Social Abilities at 18 Months, Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 435-440, 2010
  18. Anme T, et al. Bridge between Mind and Education: Evidence from Longitudinal Research on Child Care Environment and Child, Asia Pcific Mind, Brain and Education.14-18.2008
  19. Anme T, et al. Implications of Japan’s center-based night care: A one-year follow-up. Early Childhood Education Journal. 29. 2007
  20. Anme T, Segal U. Implications for the development of children placed in 11+ hours of center-based care, Child: care, health and development, 30(4), 345-352, 2004.
  21. Anme T, Segal U. Center-based evening child care: Implications for young children’s development, Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(3), 137-143, 2003.

 

Questionnaire

Index of Child Care Environment

  • 1.How often do you play with your child (stay with child face to face)?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 2.How often do you go shopping with your child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 3.How often do you read books to your child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 4.How often do you sing songs with your child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 5.How often do you go to park with your child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 6.How often do you and your child meet with friends or relatives with children of a similar age?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 7.How often does your spouse, partner, or other caregiver help you with the child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 8.How often does your child eat meals together with both parents?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 9.What do you do if your child spills milk purposely?

1)spank the child
2)scold the child
3)discipline in another way(content: )
4)determine how to prevent it in the future
5)other(          )

 

  • 10.How many times did you spank your child last week?

1)never
2)1~2times
3)3-4times
4)5-6times
5)almost every day

 

  • 11.How many times do you have a chance to talk with your spouse/partner about your child?

1)rarely
2)1~3/month
3)1~2/week
4)3~4/week
5)almost every day

 

  • 12.Does someone help you take care of your child?

1)No
2)Yes

If yes, circle all the following that apply:

1)spouse
2)grandparent
3)friend
4)relative
5)neighbor
6)babysitter
7)child care professionals from the early childhood education and care centers
8)other

 

  • 13.Do you have someone to consult with about childcare?

1)No
2)Yes

If yes, circle all the following that apply:

1)spouse
2)grandparent
3)friend
4)relative
5)neighbor
6)child care professionals from the early childhood education and care centers
7)director of the early childhood education and care centers
8)babysitter
9)other

 

Social Skill Scale : SSS

 

Description of Measures

Purpose
To evaluate children’s social competence in a short period of time during daily situations in order to promote healthy development.

Objects
SSS is intended for preschool-age children and can measure individual differences in social skills.

Conceptual Organization
This scale contains three factors repeatedly identified as important in previous studies: cooperation, self-control, and assertion.

 

Scoring

Score Types
Each item is assessed on a 3-point scale (2 = always/very often, 1 = sometimes, 0 = never).

Score Interpretation
Higher scores reflect higher level of child’s social skills.

 

Psychometric Support

Reliability and Validity
This scale contains three factors repeatedly identified as important in previous studies: cooperation, self-control, and assertion.

 

Norms and/or Comparative Data

[ Japan Child Care Cohort ]

Cohort research in the “Japan Child Care Research” in Japan, supported by Japanese Government, used the ICCE for “Exploring the effect factors on the child’s development in Japan”.

Data Points
Children ages from 0-months-old to 6 years old all over Japan.

Respondent
Primary caregivers and their children

 

[ JCCC/JST Use ]

Cohort research in the “Brain-Science & Society Program” in Japan, supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), used the IRS for “Exploring the effect factors on the child’s cognitive and behavior development in Japan”.

Data Points
Children ages 18-months-old, 30-months-old, 42-months-old and 7 years old: Mie and Osaka sites, which are two middle cities in Japan.

Respondent
Primary maternal caregivers and their children

 

Ⅾownloads

English Version Download : Click here!

Chinese Version Download : Click here!

 

Reference:

  1. Anme T. et.al, Validity and Reliability of the Social Skill Scale (SSS) as an Index of Social Competence for Preschool Children, Journal of Health Science, 3(1):5-11, 2013.
  2. Anme T, Tanaka E., et al. Validity and Reliability of the Index of Child Care Environment (ICCE), Public Health Frontier, 2(6), 2013.
  3. Anme T, Tanaka E, Watanabe T, Tomisaki E, and Watanabe K, Social Skills: Perceptions, Role in Autistic Children and Assistive Technology Chapter4 Web Application for Social Skill Development in Children with Autism, Nova Science Publishers, 2016
  4. Yantong Zhu, Xiang Li, Dandan Jiao, Emiko Tanaka, Etsuko Tomisaki, Taeko Watanabe, Yuko Sawada, Zhu Zhu, Ammara Ajmal, Munenori Matsumoto and Tokie Anme, Development of Social Skills in Kindergarten: A Latent Class Growth Modeling Approach, Children, Vol-8, Issue 10:870, 2021
  5. Zhu Zhu, Emiko Tanaka, Etsuko Tomisaki, Taeko Watanabe, Yuko Sawada, Xiang Li, Dandan Jiao, Ammara Ajmal, Munenori Matsumoto, Yantong Zhu, Tokie Anme, Do it yourself: The role of early self-care ability in social skills in Japanese preschool settings, School Psychology International, Volume-43, Issue 1:71-87, 2021
  6. Xiang Li, Dandan Jiao, Munenori Matsumoto, Yantong Zhu, Jinrui Zhang, Zhu Zhu, Yang Liu, Mingyu Cui, Yanlin Wang, Meiling Qian, Ammara Ajmal, Alpona Afsari Banu, Yolanda Graça, Emiko Tanaka, Taeko Watanabe, Yuko Sawada, Etsuko Tomisaki & Tokie Anme, Home environment and social skills of Japanese preschool children pre- and post-COVID-19, Early Child Development and Care, 2022
  7. Zhu Zhu, Dandan Jiao, Xiang Li, Yantong Zhu, Cunyoen Kim, Ammara Ajmal, Munenori Matsumoto, Emiko Tanaka, Etsuko Tomisaki, Taeko Watanabe, Yuko Sawada & Tokie Anme, Measurement invariance and country difference in children’s social skills development: Evidence from Japanese and Chinese samples, CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022
  8. Yantong Zhu, Zhu Zhu, Dandan Jiao, Xiang Li, Emiko Tanaka, Etsuko Tomisaki, Taeko Watanabe, Yuko Sawada, Munenori Matsumoto, Mingyu Cui, Yang Liu, Tokie Anme, Bidirectional relations between self-control and cooperation among Japanese preschoolers: A random-intercept cross-lagged panel analysis, Vol-64, Issue-3:139-147, 2023