University Hospital Clinical Trial Alliance (UHCT Alliance)
Gunma Univ. | Shinshu Univ. | Chiba Univ. | Univ. of Tsukuba | Tokyo Medical & Dental Univ. |
Univ. of Tokyo | Niigata Univ. | Univ. of Yamanashi | Total | ||
2012 | Number of protocols | 20 | 14 | 28 | 21 | 55 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 196 |
Number of patients on contracts | 150 | 67 | 164 | 87 | 195 | 122 | 106 | 36 | 927 | |
Number of patients enrolled | 135 | 61 | 149 | 62 | 141 | 103 | 77 | 25 | 753 | |
Performance rate* (%) | 90 | 91.0 | 90.9 | 71.3 | 72.3 | 84.4 | 72.6 | 69.4 | 81.2 | |
2011 | Number of protocols | 18 | 20 | 30 | 19 | 38 | 41 | 14 | 180 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 61 | 72 | 120 | 86 | 201 | 246 | 72 | 858 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 56 | 60 | 105 | 61 | 146 | 191 | 60 | 679 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 91.8 | 83.3 | 87.5 | 70.9 | 72.6 | 77.6 | 83.3 | 79.1 | ||
2010 | Number of protocols | 23 | 20 | 24 | 29 | 39 | 31 | 15 | 181 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 112 | 77 | 140 | 108 | 164 | 115 | 88 | 804 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 96 | 66 | 121 | 83 | 113 | 88 | 77 | 644 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 85.7 | 85.7 | 86.4 | 76.9 | 68.9 | 76.5 | 87.5 | 80.1 | ||
2009 | Number of protocols | 26 | 7 | 21 | 15 | 33 | 45 | 20 | 167 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 125 | 44 | 101 | 81 | 176 | 213 | 113 | 853 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 101 | 30 | 84 | 55 | 144 | 158 | 85 | 657 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 80.8 | 68.2 | 83.2 | 67.9 | 81.8 | 74.2 | 75.2 | 77 | ||
2008 | Number of protocols | 21 | 15 | 26 | 33 | 49 | 49 | 20 | 213 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 121 | 88 | 86 | 134 | 249 | 347 | 82 | 1,107 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 105 | 70 | 64 | 91 | 197 | 278 | 62 | 867 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 86.8 | 79.5 | 74.4 | 67.9 | 74.9 | 80.1 | 75.6 | 78.3 | ||
2007 | Number of protocols | 20 | 8 | 18 | 21 | 43 | 24 | 15 | 149 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 99 | 43 | 112 | 119 | 199 | 129 | 111 | 812 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 79 | 32 | 78 | 90 | 155 | 91 | 91 | 616 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 79.8 | 74.4 | 70 | 75.6 | 73.3 | 70.5 | 82 | 75.9 | ||
2006 | Number of protocols | 30 | 20 | 14 | 19 | 36 | 33 | 23 | 175 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 143 | 78 | 76 | 94 | 210 | 221 | 86 | 908 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 89 | 52 | 60 | 60 | 178 | 165 | 53 | 657 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 62.2 | 66.6 | 78.9 | 63.8 | 84.8 | 75 | 61.6 | 72.4 | ||
2005 | Number of protocols | 29 | 12 | 25 | 19 | 43 | 30 | 29 | 187 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 185 | 66 | 175 | 132 | 193 | 151 | 144 | 1,046 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 109 | 45 | 124 | 82 | 139 | 113 | 84 | 696 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 58.9 | 68.2 | 70.9 | 62.1 | 72 | 75 | 58.3 | 66.5 | ||
2004 | Number of protocols | 18 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 34 | 39 | 22 | 167 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 114 | 99 | 120 | 146 | 157 | 372 | 121 | 1,129 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 85 | 71 | 93 | 114 | 129 | 289 | 71 | 852 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 74.6 | 71.7 | 77.5 | 78.1 | 82.2 | 77.7 | 58.7 | 75.5 | ||
2003 | Number of protocols | 24 | 21 | 22 | 14 | 45 | 38 | 24 | 188 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 126 | 137 | 116 | 130 | 197 | 282 | 98 | 1,086 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 85 | 82 | 88 | 112 | 157 | 196 | 74 | 794 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 67.5 | 59.9 | 75.9 | 86.2 | 79.7 | 69.5 | 75.5 | 73.1 | ||
2002 | Number of protocols | 25 | 18 | 17 | 15 | 51 | 36 | 31 | 193 | |
Number of patients on contracts | 136 | 104 | 73 | 85 | 232 | 240 | 159 | 1,029 | ||
Number of patients enrolled | 98 | 60 | 46 | 46 | 190 | 158 | 96 | 694 | ||
Performance rate* (%) | 72.1 | 57.7 | 63 | 54.1 | 81.9 | 65.8 | 60.4 | 67.4 |
*Number of patients enrolled / Number of patients on contracts x 100 (Round off to one decimal place.)