単独で行う成人の一次救命処置
(Single-Rescuer Adult Basic Life Support)
参考文献(No. 1〜20)


No. 1

[PubMed]

Ann Emerg Med 1993 Feb;22(2 Pt 2):508-11

International emergency cardiac care: support, science, and universal guidelines.

Chamberlain D, Cummins RO

Royal Sussex Hospital, Brighton, England.

Mature resuscitation councils must continue to support educational and training efforts of less-developed countries, but only when strong local interest exists. The scientific basis for the interventions and organization of emergency cardiac care is international in origin. Educational approaches are varied and innovative and should be shared. The era of single national guideline conferences on CPR and emergency cardiac care has ended. Future guideline conferences must cast a broad net to be more international in both participants and scientific knowledge. Existing organizations should support an international infrastructure to help pool scientific and educational expertise.


No. 2

[PubMed]


No. 3

[PubMed]


No. 4

[PubMed]

N Engl J Med 1993 Aug 26;329(9):600-6

Racial differences in the incidence of cardiac arrest and subsequent survival. The CPR Chicago Project.

Becker LB, Han BH, Meyer PM, Wright FA, Rhodes KV, Smith DW, Barrett J

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL.


BACKGROUND. Differences between blacks and whites have been reported in the incidence of several forms of cardiovascular disease, including hypertension and stroke. We examined racial differences in the incidence of cardiac arrest in a large urban population and in subsequent survival. METHODS. We collected data on all nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Chicago from January 1, 1987, through December 31, 1988, and compared the incidence and survival rates for blacks and whites. We examined the association between survival and race and seven other known risk factors by logistic-regression analysis. We computed incidence rates by coupling our data with U.S. Census population data.

RESULTS. Our study population comprised 6451 patients: 3207 whites, 2910 blacks, and 334 persons of other races. The incidence of cardiac arrest was significantly higher for blacks than for whites in every age group. The survival rate after cardiac arrest was 2.6 percent in whites, as compared with 0.8 percent in blacks (P < 0.001). Blacks were significantly less likely to have a witnessed cardiac arrest, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or a "favorable" initial rhythm or to be admitted to the hospital. When they were admitted, blacks were half as likely to survive. The association between race and survival persisted even when other recognized risk factors were taken into account. We did not find important differences between blacks and whites in the response times of the emergency medical services.

CONCLUSIONS. The black community in our study was at higher risk for cardiac arrest and subsequent death than the white community, even after we controlled for other variables.

Comments:

  1. Comment in: N Engl J Med 1993 Aug 26;329(9):656-8

  2. Comment in: N Engl J Med 1994 Jan 20;330(3):216; discussion 217-8
  3. Comment in: N Engl J Med 1994 Jan 20;330(3):216-7; discussion 217-8
  4. Comment in: N Engl J Med 1994 Jan 20;330(3):217; discussion 217-8
  5. Comment in: ACP J Club 1994 Mar-Apr;120 Suppl 2:47


No. 5

[PubMed]

Ann Emerg Med 1990 Feb;19(2):179-86

Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities.

Eisenberg MS, Horwood BT, Cummins RO, Reynolds-Haertle R, Hearne TR

Center for Evaluation of Emergency Medical Services, King County Health Department, Seattle, Washington.

Published reports of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest give widely varying results. The variation in survival rates within each type of system is due, in part, to variation in definitions. To determine other reasons for differences in survival rates, we reviewed published studies conducted from 1967 to 1988 on 39 emergency medical services programs from 29 different locations. These programs could be grouped into five types of prehospital systems based on the personnel who deliver CPR, defibrillation, medications, and endotracheal intubation; the five systems were three types of single-response systems (basic emergency medical technician [EMT], EMT-defibrillation [EMT-D], and paramedic) and two double-response systems (EMT/paramedic and EMT-D/paramedic). Reported discharge rates ranged from 2% to 25% for all cardiac rhythms and from 3% to 33% for ventricular fibrillation. The lowest survival rates occurred in single-response systems and the highest rates in double-response systems, although there was considerable variation within each type of system. Hypothetical survival curves suggest that the ability to resuscitate is a function of time, type, and sequence of therapy. Survival appears to be highest in double-response systems because CPR is started early. We speculate that early CPR permits definitive procedures, including defibrillation, medications, and intubation, to be more effective.


No. 6

[PubMed]

Anaesthesia 1995 Aug;50(8):692-4

Resuscitation skills of trainee anaesthetists.

Bell JH, Harrison DA, Carr B

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.

We assessed the basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of 30 trainee anaesthetists in a simulated exercise. Only one person performed basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation as outlined in the 1992 European Resuscitation Council guidelines. The management of ventricular fibrillation and asystole were correctly carried out by eight (27%) and nine (30%) anaesthetists, respectively. Neither the seniority of the anaesthetists nor their postgraduate qualifications correlated with their performance level. We conclude that all trainee anaesthetists need to undergo regular training and assessment of their resuscitation skills.

Comments:

  1. Comment in: Anaesthesia 1995 Dec;50(12):1094


No. 7

[PubMed]

J Adv Nurs 1996 May;23(5):1016-23

A quasi-experimental research to investigate the retention of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and knowledge by qualified nurses following a course in professional development.

Broomfield R

University of Teesside College of Health, South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough, England.

The research was undertaken with the intention of testing six null hypotheses regarding the retention of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills and knowledge of registered nurses. The hypotheses were formulated from the broad aims of the research, which were to investigate conclusions reached by other researchers highlighting the speed with which retention of CPR skills and knowledge deteriorates, and to investigate the need for regular updating in CPR. The research was quasi-experimental in nature. The 19 nurses participating in the research were qualified staff undertaking the English National Board (ENB) 923 course in Professional Development, which included a refresher on basic CPR skills and included some discussion regarding advanced techniques. The latest guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (1993) were used, which also aided in the design and use of the two research tools, namely an eight-point skills-testing observation tool and a 26-point knowledge-testing questionnaire. While a 3-hour update in CPR skills revealed an initial improvement, the decrease in retention of skills 10 weeks later was significant (P = 0.0000). The update in CPR knowledge also revealed an initial improvement but the decrease in retention of knowledge 10 weeks later was significant (P = 0.0000). The findings of the research reflect similar results to previous research undertaken and discussed in the literature review, suggesting that retention of skills and knowledge quickly deteriorates if not used or updated regularly. Therefore this research supports the importance of CPR refresher courses on a regular basis.


No. 8

[PubMed]

Resuscitation 1995 Jun;29(3):215-8

Resuscitation skills amongst anaesthetists.

Quiney NF, Gardner J, Brampton W

Department of Anaesthesia, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, UK.

Resuscitation skills were assessed in a group of 24 anaesthetists of varying experience using 3 pre-determined scenarios. Seventy-nine percent of participants were found to be competent at resuscitation following the guidelines suggested by the Resuscitation Council (UK) in 1989. No one grade of anaesthetist was found to be consistently poor at resuscitation. Anaesthetists by the nature of their jobs may maintain the skills and knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as other groups in the hospital.


No. 9

[PubMed]

Arch Intern Med 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1763-9

Reluctance of internists and medical nurses to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Brenner BE, Kauffman J

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

BACKGROUND: Physicians and nurses constitute a major part of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation responders and serve as educators and resource personnel concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We decided to determine if fear of infectious disease has dampened physician and nurse response to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation (MMR).

METHODS: Four hundred thirty-three internists and one hundred fifty-two medical nurses responded to presentations of mock cardiac arrest scenarios. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of the physicians and 80% of the nurses would refuse to do MMR on a stranger. Between 18% and 25% of nurses and attending internists would not do MMR on a child. Being born in the United States or white racial background decreased the reluctance of the respondents to perform MMR. Only 15% of the respondents would do MMR on a stranger in a gay neighborhood. All respondents that would not do MMR stated that their reason involved fear of contracting communicable diseases, especially acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS: Internists and medical nurses are highly reluctant to perform MMR. We recommend that the teaching of MMR should emphasize performance on children and family members where willingness to perform MMR is high. We urge public education along with widespread availability of effective barrier masks to resuscitate MMR itself.


No. 10

[PubMed]

Ann Emerg Med 1990 Feb;19(2):151-6

Attitudes of BCLS instructors about mouth-to-mouth resuscitation during the AIDS epidemic.

Ornato JP, Hallagan LF, McMahan SB, Peeples EH, Rostafinski AG

Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298.

We surveyed 5,823 American Heart Association Virginia Affiliate basic cardiac life support (BCLS) instructors to assess the impact that the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has had on their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors with respect to the training and performance of mouth-to-mouth (MTM) ventilation. The response rate by those whose mail survey could be delivered to a valid address was 41% (women, 63%; men, 37%; mean age, 38 +/- 1 years; health care providers, 87%; laypersons, 11%; and public safety workers, 2%). Of those surveyed, 49% had performed CPR within the past three years. Of these, 40% reported having hesitated to provide MTM ventilation at least once. Of those who had hesitated, more than one half identified fear of exposure to disease as the reason for their hesitation. Forty percent of all respondents had witnessed another provider hesitate to provide MTM ventilation. When presented with mock rescue scenarios, the majority of respondents indicated that they would not perform or would hesitate to perform MTM ventilation on most adult strangers. More than half felt that there was some risk of contracting AIDS from ventilating a manikin, and 71% said that their attitudes about providing CPR to strangers had changed as a result of the AIDS epidemic. We conclude that concern about AIDS appears to be adversely affecting the attitudes, beliefs, and self-reported behaviors of BCLS instructors in Virginia regarding the use of MTM ventilation on strangers.


No. 11

[PubMed]

JAMA 1994 Mar 2;271(9):678-83

Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City. The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study.

Lombardi G, Gallagher J, Gennis P

Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.


OBJECTIVE--To determine survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City and to compare this with other urban, suburban, and rural areas.

DESIGN--Observational cohort study.

SETTING--New York City.

PARTICIPANTS--Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between October 1, 1990, and April 1, 1991.

INTERVENTION--Trained paramedics performed immediate postarrest interviews with care providers, using a standardized questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Entry criteria, elapsed time intervals, and nodal events conformed to Utstein recommendations. The single target end point was death or discharge home.

RESULTS--Of 3243 consecutive cardiac arrests on which resuscitation was attempted, 2329 (72%) met entry criteria as primary cardiac events. Overall survival was 1.4% (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.3%). No patients were lost to follow-up. Survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation was 5.3% (99% CI, 2.9% to 8.8%). Using survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation for intersystem comparison, our survival rate was similar to that of Chicago, Ill (4.0%; 99% CI, 1.9% to 7.5%; P = .41), the only other large city on which data were available. However, it was significantly lower than that reported from midsized urban/suburban areas (33.0%; 99% CI, 30.4% to 35.6%; P < .0001) and suburban/rural areas (12.6%; 99% CI, 8.9% to 16.3%; P < .0001). Survival rate among arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel (8.5%; 99% CI, 4.7% to 14.0%) was comparable with Chicago (6.6%; 99% CI, 3.3% to 11.5%; P = .41) but markedly lower than King County, Washington (36%; 99% CI, 28.6% to 43.8%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS--Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City was poor. This was partly attributable to lengthy elapsed time intervals at every step in the chain of survival. However, examination of survival among arrests occurring after emergency medical services arrival suggests that other features may predispose residents of large cities to higher cardiac arrest mortality than individuals living in more suburban or rural settings. Since half the US population resides in large metropolitan areas, this represents a public health problem of considerable magnitude.

Comments:

  1. Comment in: JAMA 1994 Nov 23-30;272(20):1573-4


No. 12

[PubMed]

Resuscitation 1989;17 Suppl:S55-69; discussion S199-206

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group.

Bossaert L, Van Hoeyweghen R

Department of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Antwerp, UIA, Belgium.

Prevalence of bystander CPR and effect on outcome has been evaluated on 3053 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) events. Bystander CPR was performed in 33% of recorded cases (n = 998) by lay people in 406 cases (family members 178, other lay people 228) and by bystanding health care workers in 592 cases (nurses 86, doctors 506). Family members and lay people mainly applied CPR in younger CA victims at public places, roadside or at the working place. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and drowning are highly represented. Health care workers performed CPR mainly in older patients, at public places or at the roadside and especially in case of cardiac or respiratory origin. CA caused by trauma/exsanguination and intoxication/metabolic origin received less bystander CPR (23% resp. 22%). Cardiac arrests receiving bystander CPR are more frequently witnessed and have a shorter access time to the emergency medical service (EMS) system and shorter response time of basic life support (BLS). Advanced life support (ALS) response time is significantly longer. In witnessed arrests of cardiac origin receiving bystander CPR a significantly better late survival was observed. In non-witnessed arrests of cardiac origin early and late survival are significantly higher in patients receiving bystander CPR. In CA events where response time of ALS exceeds 8 min, the beneficial effect of bystander CPR is most significant. Furthermore no deleterious effect of bad technique or inefficient bystander CPR can be demonstrated.


No. 13

[PubMed]


No. 14

[PubMed]


No. 15

[PubMed]

Anaesthesia 1996 Feb;51(2):189-91

The palpation of pulses.

Mather C, O'Kelly S

Shackleton Department of Anaesthetics, Southampton General Hospital. In 554 anaesthetised patients, the times taken to separately palpate and identify each of the carotid, radial, brachial and femoral pulses were recorded. The patients were divided into three groups based on the form of airway management chosen (tracheal tube, facemask or laryngeal mask airway). Our results demonstrate that in the operating theatre environment the identification of the radial pulse is the most rapid and reliable; by 5 s, 98% and by 10 s, more than 99% of radial pulses were identified. The carotid pulse was not so easily identified, requiring 10 s to enable an identification rate of greater than 95%. The presence of a laryngeal mask airway or a tracheal tube did not hinder the identification of carotid pulse.

Publication Types:

Clinical trial
Controlled clinical trial


No. 16

[PubMed]


No. 17

[PubMed]


No. 18

[PubMed]

Resuscitation 1997 Aug;35(1):23-6

Skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse.

Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D

Department of Anaesthesiology, Emergency- and Critical Care Medicine, University of Gottingen, Germany.

American Heart Association as well as European Resuscitation Council require the carotid pulse check to determine pulselessness in an unconscious victim and to decide whether or not cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be initiated. Recent studies on the ability of health professionals to check the carotid pulse have called this diagnostic tool in question and led to discussions. To contribute to this discussion we performed a study to evaluate skills of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. A group of 449 volunteers (most had participated in a first aid course) were asked to check the carotid pulse in a young healthy, non-obese person by counting aloud the detected pulse rate. Time intervals until correct detection of the carotid pulse were registered. Overall the volunteers needed an average of 9.46 s, ranging from 1 to 70 s. Only 47.4% of the volunteers were able to detect a pulse within 5 s, and 73.7% within 10 s. A level of 95% volunteers detecting the pulse correctly was reached only after 35 s. Based on these findings we conclude that the intervals established for carotid pulse check may be too short and that perhaps the value of pulse check within in the scope of CPR needs to be reconsidered.


No. 19

[PubMed]

Resuscitation 1996 Dec;33(2):107-16

Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulse.

Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S, Tzanova I

Department of Anaesthesiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical School, Mainz, Germany. moenk@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de

International guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adults advocate that cardiac arrest be recognized within 5-10 s, by the absence of a pulse in the carotid arteries. However, validation of first responders' assessment of the carotid pulse has begun only recently. We aimed (1) to develop a methodology to study diagnostic accuracy in detecting the presence or absence of the carotid pulse in unresponsive patients, and (2) to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and time required by first responders to assess the carotid pulse. In 16 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, four groups of first responders (EMT-1: 107 laypersons with basic life support (BLS) training; EMT-2: 16 emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in training; PM-1: 74 paramedics in training; PM-2: 9 certified paramedics) performed, single-blinded and randomly allocated, carotid pulse assessment either during spontaneous circulation, or during non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. Time to diagnosis of carotid pulse status, concurrent haemodynamics and diagnostic accuracy were recorded. In 10% (6/59), an absent carotid pulse was not recognized as pulselessness. In 45% (66/147), a pulse was not identified despite a carotid pulse with a systolic pressure > or = 80 mmHg. Thus, although sensitivity of all participants for central pulselessness approached 90%, specificity was only 55%. Both sensitivity and, to a lesser degree, specificity improved with increasing training; blood pressure or heart rate had no significant effect. The median diagnostic delay was 24 s (minimum 3 s). When no carotid pulse was found, delays were significantly longer (30 s: minimum 13 s), than when a carotid pulse was identified (15 s; minimum 3 s) (P < 0.0001). Of all participants, only 15% (31/206) produced correct diagnoses within 10 s. Only 1/59 (2%) identified pulselessness correctly within 10 s. Our cardiopulmonary bypass model of carotid pulse assessment proved to be feasible and realistic. We conclude that recognition of pulselessness by rescuers with basic CPR training is time-consuming and inaccurate. Both intensive retraining of professional rescuers and reconsideration of guidelines about carotid pulse assessment are warranted.

Publication Types:

Clinical trial
Controlled clinical trial


No. 20

[PubMed]


Single-Rescuer Adult Basic Life Support (References)
(単独で行う成人の一次救命処置)